📌 Introduction
The recent bomb blast near Delhi’s Red Fort Metro Station shook India, killing civilians and igniting a wave of anger, fear, and geopolitical tension. Days later, an explosive twist emerged when a video of a former Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) leader surfaced online — interpreted by many as Pakistan admitting involvement in the attack.
But did Pakistan really confess? Or is this another example of viral misinformation feeding the flames of a long-standing rivalry?
🔥 The Delhi Blast: What Happened?
On 10 November 2025, a car bomb exploded near Red Fort Metro Station in central Delhi.
Over a dozen people died
Many were injured
Police invoked strict anti-terror laws (UAPA)
Intelligence agencies began probing cross-border links
The attack quickly became a matter of national security, and the government announced a multi-agency investigation.
🎥 The Viral Video That Sparked the Controversy
A few days after the blast, a video of Chaudhry Anwarul Haq, former PoK Prime Minister, went viral.
In the clip, he says:
“If you don’t stop bleeding Balochistan, we will beat them from Lal Qila to Kashmir’s forests… and we did… They still can’t count the bodies.”
To some media outlets, this sounded like a direct admission that Pakistan orchestrated the Delhi blast. Headlines exploded. Social media flooded with outrage.
But the real story is more complicated.
🧪 Fact-Check: Was It an Admission?
- The Speech Was Old
Fact-checking agencies discovered that the clip was actually from April 2025, NOT after the blast. It resurfaced during the November crisis and was framed as a fresh confession.
- No Official “Admission” by Pakistan
Despite social media claims, no arm of the Pakistani government — not the military, ISI, foreign ministry, nor civilian leadership — has confirmed involvement.
- India Also Rejected the “Admitted Involvement” Narrative
India’s Ministry of External Affairs clarified that misinformation was being circulated and urged caution until investigations conclude.
- Experts Say It Was Political Rhetoric
Analysts describe Haq’s speech as political bravado, not a literal admission of a covert operation — a common style among leaders in tense regions.
🌏 Why Did the Claim Spread So Fast?
Because the Delhi blast happened just days before the video resurfaced, the timing created a perfect storm for misinformation.
- High public emotion
Fear and anger make people vulnerable to dramatic narratives.
- India–Pakistan rivalry
Decades of conflict make both nations prone to suspect each other quickly.
- Media sensationalism
Certain channels amplified the clip without context for views and attention.
- Political use
Such claims often get weaponized by political actors on both sides.
🧨 The Geopolitical Fallout
Even without proof, the narrative has already caused tremors.
▪ In India
Public pressure is growing for a “strong response”.
Opposition parties accuse the government of intelligence failures.
Security forces have intensified border surveillance.
▪ In Pakistan
Officials deny involvement and claim the viral clip is being misrepresented.
Leaders accuse India of pushing “propaganda” to hide internal issues.
▪ International Reactions
Global agencies urge restraint and fact-based investigation.
📊 Why False Admissions Are Dangerous
False or misinterpreted statements can lead to:
- Diplomatic Escalation
A misquoted speech has the potential to provoke hostilities between two nuclear-armed neighbours.
- Public Panic
Misinformation fuels fear, conspiracy theories, and communal tensions.
- Distracted Investigations
When attention shifts to viral claims, real culprits may slip away.
- Media Manipulation
Political actors might use such clips to push their agendas.
🔍 What Experts Say
Security Analysts:
“Haq’s speech cannot be treated as state admission. No actionable evidence links Pakistan to the blast yet.”
Diplomats:
“This is a classic case of rhetoric going viral at the wrong time.”
Journalists:
“The old clip resurfaced deliberately or accidentally during a sensitive moment.”
Tech Fact-Checkers:
“Context is missing. The video is older and unrelated to the blast.”
🛑 The Line Between Claim and Confirmation
There is a massive difference between:
A political figure making fiery statements
vs.
A state formally admitting a terrorist attack
To this day, no government body in Pakistan has admitted to the Delhi blast.
However, the viral belief that they did has already shaped public discourse.
📌 Conclusion
The Delhi blast is a tragedy that demands truth, justice, and careful investigation — not rumors.
The viral video of the former PoK leader has undoubtedly intensified tensions, but it does not amount to a state confession.
In times like these, responsible reporting, calm analysis, and verified information matter more than ever.
Join the discussion 2 Comments